What's in this set
AngelMatch's pitch deck database currently has one UX design pitch deck: Roam and Wander, a software creation studio that raised $1M in an undisclosed round in 2014. This is a small set, so treat it as a single case study rather than a survey of the category. The Roam and Wander deck is worth a look because it shows how a design-and-build studio pitched itself to investors at a point when its identity was still closer to a services business than a packaged product, a tension many UX and design-adjacent founders face early on.
What investors look for in a UX design pitch deck
Studios and design shops get evaluated differently than pure software companies, and the gap shows up in a few specific places.
The studio-to-product story has to be explicit. Roam and Wander raised $1M as a software creation studio, and studios like this only get funded when the pitch draws a clear line from billable client work to a repeatable, ownable product. Investors want to see which projects are becoming the product, not just a list of past clients.
Stage clarity matters more than usual. Roam and Wander's round is listed as undisclosed even though the amount raised is public. For UX and design-focused startups, an ambiguous round can read as a lack of investor validation rather than confidentiality, so state the round plainly whenever you can.
The deck itself is a work sample. A company pitching design or product-building capability gets judged partly on how the deck looks and reads. Sloppy layout or unclear structure undercuts the pitch in a way it would not for a company selling something unrelated to design.
With just one deck tagged to UX design so far, this filter is more of a starting point than a benchmark, and Roam and Wander's $1M raise is the only reference point in the set today. Design-focused founders raising beyond this stage can search AngelMatch's investor database and find design-focused investors filtered by stage and check size, instead of cold-emailing every VC they can find.


